BunkerWeb vs NPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BunkerWeb
Next-gen Web Application Firewall (WAF) that will protect your web
VS
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
| Feature | BunkerWeb | NPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,784 | ★ 34,157 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose BunkerWeb if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 10.8k GitHub stars
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is BunkerWeb or NPS better?
Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are BunkerWeb and NPS free and open-source?
Yes. BunkerWeb is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BunkerWeb and NPS with Docker?
BunkerWeb: yes. NPS: yes.