Buku vs Joplin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBukuJoplin
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 7,177★ 55,856
First released20152017
ReplacesDeliciousEvernote, OneNote

Why pick each one

Choose Buku if…

  • Scriptable and fast
  • Portable database
  • Lightweight
Buku details

Choose Joplin if…

  • Strong privacy with E2EE
  • Flexible sync options
  • Active development
Joplin details

Frequently asked questions

Is Buku or Joplin better?

Neither is universally better. Joplin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Buku and Joplin free and open-source?

Yes. Buku is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Joplin under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Buku and Joplin with Docker?

Buku: check the project docs for container support. Joplin: yes.

Related comparisons