BrowserQuest vs OpenRCT2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBrowserQuestOpenRCT2
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 9,378★ 16,049
First released20122014
ReplacesRealm of the Mad GodRollerCoaster Tycoon

Why pick each one

Choose BrowserQuest if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
BrowserQuest details

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is BrowserQuest or OpenRCT2 better?

Neither is universally better. OpenRCT2 has the larger community, while BrowserQuest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are BrowserQuest and OpenRCT2 free and open-source?

Yes. BrowserQuest is licensed under MPL-2.0 and OpenRCT2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BrowserQuest and OpenRCT2 with Docker?

BrowserQuest: yes. OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons