Bludit vs Wagtail
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bludit
Simple flat-file CMS for fast websites and blogs
VS
Wagtail
Developer-friendly Django CMS with a great editor experience
| Feature | Bludit | Wagtail |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,464 | ★ 20,433 |
| First released | 2015 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | Adobe Experience Manager, WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Bludit or Wagtail better?
Neither is universally better. Wagtail has the larger community, while Bludit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bludit and Wagtail free and open-source?
Yes. Bludit is licensed under MIT and Wagtail under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bludit and Wagtail with Docker?
Bludit: yes. Wagtail: yes.