big-AGI vs h2oGPT
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
big-AGI
Advanced AI suite with personas, beams, and multi-model chat
VS
h2oGPT
Private chat and document Q&A with local LLMs
| Feature | big-AGI | h2oGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Chat UIs | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,079 | ★ 11,979 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | ChatGPT | ChatGPT |
Why pick each one
Choose big-AGI if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
Choose h2oGPT if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is big-AGI or h2oGPT better?
Neither is universally better. h2oGPT has the larger community, while big-AGI is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are big-AGI and h2oGPT free and open-source?
Yes. big-AGI is licensed under MIT and h2oGPT under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run big-AGI and h2oGPT with Docker?
big-AGI: yes. h2oGPT: yes.