Fabric vs h2oGPT
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fabric
Open-source framework for augmenting humans with AI
VS
h2oGPT
Private chat and document Q&A with local LLMs
| Feature | Fabric | h2oGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 43,353 | ★ 11,979 |
| First released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaces | ChatGPT | ChatGPT |
Why pick each one
Choose Fabric if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 43.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose h2oGPT if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Fabric or h2oGPT better?
Fabric is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider h2oGPT if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Fabric and h2oGPT free and open-source?
Yes. Fabric is licensed under MIT and h2oGPT under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fabric and h2oGPT with Docker?
Fabric: check the project docs for container support. h2oGPT: yes.