Open WebUI
AI Chat UIsFeature-rich self-hosted web interface for local LLMs
Replaces ChatGPT, Poe
Self-hosted web frontends for chatting with local or remote LLMs, alternatives to ChatGPT.
11 self-hosted apps · 36 comparisons
Feature-rich self-hosted web interface for local LLMs
Replaces ChatGPT, Poe
Lightweight, fast cross-platform AI chat application
Replaces ChatGPT
Modern design AI chat framework supporting multiple AI providers, one
Replaces ChatGPT
Enhanced ChatGPT clone supporting many AI providers
Replaces ChatGPT, Poe
ChatGPT but better
Replaces ChatGPT
Advanced AI suite with personas, beams, and multi-model chat
Replaces ChatGPT
No-code agentic RAG deployment in a Docker container
Replaces OpenAI Assistants
Plugin framework for extending self-hosted AI chat UIs
Replaces ChatGPT Plugins
Polished offline-capable UI for the OpenAI-compatible APIs
Replaces ChatGPT
ChatGPT web UI fork with LangChain tools and plugins
Replaces ChatGPT
Minimal web UI for Ollama and OpenAI models
Replaces ChatGPT
No apps match these filters.
Last reviewed Aug 26, 2026 · 436 words
None of these apps run models. An AI chat UI is a frontend that talks to an inference backend — Ollama on your own box, or any OpenAI-compatible API — and the whole category fits in 256 MB to 2 GB of RAM because the heavy lifting happens elsewhere. That makes the choice cheap to get wrong and cheap to redo, but three axes still separate the twelve options meaningfully.
Count your users first. Single-user tools like NextChat (MIT, 512 MB, 88,653 stars) are lighter and simpler, but the moment a second person wants an account you need real multi-user support — separate histories, roles, and authentication. Second, price in the database: some frontends are one self-contained container, while LibreChat needs MongoDB and the heavier frameworks want Postgres, which turns a five-minute deploy into a small stack you now operate. Third, check backend breadth against what you actually run: everything here speaks the OpenAI-compatible protocol, but integration depth with Ollama specifically — model pulling, RAG over your documents, web search — varies a lot.
Open WebUI (BSD-3-Clause, 149,927 stars, 2 GB) is the category's center of gravity: a polished ChatGPT-style interface with multi-user roles, built-in RAG document uploads, and a plugin pipeline system, in one container. Two catalogue gotchas: the first account created becomes the admin, so register before you share the URL, and if Ollama runs on the host rather than in Docker you need --add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway and OLLAMA_BASE_URL pointed at it. LibreChat (MIT) wins for teams: OAuth and LDAP login, agents, and the widest multi-provider switching, worth its MongoDB dependency. NextChat wins when it is just you and an API key — it even ships desktop and mobile builds.
ChatBot UI still shows 33,340 stars and is no longer actively maintained — this category moved so fast in 2023–2024 that several early leaders are effectively frozen. Before deploying anything here, check the last commit date, not the star count; a chat UI that stopped tracking provider API changes degrades within months.
Open WebUI, pointed at Ollama, first account claimed by you. It is the default pairing for good reasons: single container, active development, and it grows from solo chat to a multi-user household service without a migration. Pick NextChat instead only if you are certain it stays single-user, and LibreChat when a team and SSO enter the picture.
36 head-to-head comparisons in this category.