Berty vs Stoat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyStoat
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 2,572
First released20182025
ReplacesWhatsApp, Signal

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose Stoat if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Stoat details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or Stoat better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while Stoat is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and Stoat free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Stoat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and Stoat with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. Stoat: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons