Berty vs SIP3
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Berty
Peer-to-peer messaging app that works offline
VS
SIP3
VoIP troubleshooting and monitoring platform
| Feature | Berty | SIP3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,268 | — |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Berty if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose SIP3 if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Berty or SIP3 better?
Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while SIP3 is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Berty and SIP3 free and open-source?
Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SIP3 under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Berty and SIP3 with Docker?
Berty: check the project docs for container support. SIP3: check the project docs for container support.