Berty vs SAMA
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Berty
Peer-to-peer messaging app that works offline
VS
SAMA
Next-Gen self-hosted chat server and clients
| Feature | Berty | SAMA |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,268 | ★ 159 |
| First released | 2018 | 2026 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Berty if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose SAMA if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Berty or SAMA better?
Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while SAMA is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Berty and SAMA free and open-source?
Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SAMA under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Berty and SAMA with Docker?
Berty: check the project docs for container support. SAMA: yes.