SHSelfHostIndex

Anuko Time Tracker vs Clockify Selfhost Cattr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AN Anuko Time Tracker Simple multi-user web time tracking system VS CL Clockify Selfhost Cattr Open-source time tracking and team productivity
FeatureAnuko Time TrackerClockify Selfhost Cattr
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 207★ 97
First released20032019
ReplacesClockify, HarvestHubstaff, Time Doctor

Why pick each one

Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Anuko Time Tracker details

Choose Clockify Selfhost Cattr if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Clockify Selfhost Cattr details

Frequently asked questions

Is Anuko Time Tracker or Clockify Selfhost Cattr better?

Anuko Time Tracker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Clockify Selfhost Cattr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Anuko Time Tracker and Clockify Selfhost Cattr free and open-source?

Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Clockify Selfhost Cattr under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and Clockify Selfhost Cattr with Docker?

Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. Clockify Selfhost Cattr: yes.

Related comparisons