Antora vs Raneto
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Raneto
Free, open, simple Markdown-powered knowledge base
| Feature | Antora | Raneto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 2,899 |
| First released | 2017 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | Confluence, Zendesk Guide |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Raneto better?
Raneto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Antora if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Antora and Raneto free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Raneto under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Raneto with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Raneto: yes.