Antora vs Orchid
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Orchid
Static site generator for documentation and blogs on the JVM
| Feature | Antora | Orchid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MPL-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Kotlin |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 529 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | Jekyll, GitBook |
Why pick each one
Choose Orchid if…
- Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Kotlin
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Orchid better?
Neither is universally better. Antora has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Antora and Orchid free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Orchid under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Orchid with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Orchid: check the project docs for container support.