Actual Budget vs Costflow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureActual BudgetCostflow
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score98 · Excellent0 · At risk
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcesource, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,118★ 33
First released20222019
ReplacesYNAB, MintExpensify, Mint

What are Actual Budget and Costflow?

Actual Budget

Actual is a free, open-source personal finance app focused on zero-based, envelope-style budgeting. It is local-first with end-to-end encrypted sync across devices.

  • Envelope budgeting method
  • Local-first with encrypted sync
  • Fast and responsive UI
  • Bank import via plugins

Read the full Actual Budget guide →

Costflow

Costflow is an open-source parser that turns plain-language messages into Beancount, Ledger, or hledger entries. It lets users record transactions from chat apps and append them to a journal file.

  • Natural-language entries
  • Beancount and Ledger output
  • Chat app integration
  • Plain-text journals

Actual Budget vs Costflow: key differences

Actual Budget is written in TypeScript, while Costflow is built with JavaScript. Costflow is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Actual Budget. Costflow is the more established project (first released 2019), while Actual Budget arrived in 2022. Actual Budget has the considerably larger community, at 29,118 GitHub stars versus 33. Actual Budget lists first-class Docker deployment; Costflow does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Actual Budget if…

  • Snappy offline-first experience
  • Privacy-focused sync

Watch out for

  • Bank sync needs extra setup
  • Fewer reports than alternatives
Actual Budget details

Choose Costflow if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Costflow details

Frequently asked questions

Is Actual Budget or Costflow better?

Actual Budget is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Costflow if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Actual Budget and Costflow free and open-source?

Yes. Actual Budget is licensed under MIT and Costflow under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Actual Budget and Costflow with Docker?

Actual Budget: yes. Costflow: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Actual Budget or Costflow?

Costflow has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Actual Budget. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons