Acrylamid vs Typecho
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Acrylamid | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 10 · At risk | 85 · Excellent |
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 280 | ★ 12,446 |
| First released | 2011 | 2008 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
What are Acrylamid and Typecho?
Acrylamid
Acrylamid is a static blog compiler written in Python that focuses on fast incremental rebuilds and supports multiple markup languages. It generates a complete static site that can be hosted anywhere.
- Incremental rebuilds
- Multiple markup formats
- Static output
- Jinja2 templating
Typecho
Typecho is an open-source blogging platform written in PHP, focused on being simple, lightweight, and fast. It is especially popular among developers in the Chinese-speaking community.
- Lightweight and fast
- Markdown support
- Plugin and theme ecosystem
- Simple installation
Acrylamid vs Typecho: key differences
Acrylamid is written in Python, while Typecho is built with PHP. Licensing differs — BSD-2-Clause for Acrylamid versus GPL-2.0 for Typecho. Acrylamid is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Typecho. Typecho is the more established project (first released 2008), while Acrylamid arrived in 2011. Typecho has the considerably larger community, at 12,446 GitHub stars versus 280. Typecho lists first-class Docker deployment; Acrylamid does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Acrylamid if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Typecho if…
- Very lightweight
- Clean codebase
Watch out for
- Documentation mostly in Chinese
- Smaller global community
Frequently asked questions
Is Acrylamid or Typecho better?
Typecho is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Acrylamid if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Acrylamid and Typecho free and open-source?
Yes. Acrylamid is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Typecho under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Acrylamid and Typecho with Docker?
Acrylamid: check the project docs for container support. Typecho: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Acrylamid or Typecho?
Acrylamid has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Typecho. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.