Acrylamid vs FlatPress
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Acrylamid | FlatPress |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 10 · At risk | 73 · Good |
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 280 | ★ 215 |
| First released | 2011 | 2005 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
What are Acrylamid and FlatPress?
Acrylamid
Acrylamid is a static blog compiler written in Python that focuses on fast incremental rebuilds and supports multiple markup languages. It generates a complete static site that can be hosted anywhere.
- Incremental rebuilds
- Multiple markup formats
- Static output
- Jinja2 templating
FlatPress
FlatPress is an open-source blogging engine that requires no database, storing all content in flat files. It is designed to be simple, fast, and easy to deploy on minimal hosting.
- No database required
- Flat-file storage
- Plugin and theme support
- Lightweight
Acrylamid vs FlatPress: key differences
Acrylamid is written in Python, while FlatPress is built with PHP. Licensing differs — BSD-2-Clause for Acrylamid versus GPL-2.0 for FlatPress. Acrylamid is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for FlatPress. FlatPress is the more established project (first released 2005), while Acrylamid arrived in 2011.
Why pick each one
Choose Acrylamid if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose FlatPress if…
- Trivial to install and back up
- Runs on minimal hosting
Watch out for
- Small community
- Basic feature set
Frequently asked questions
Is Acrylamid or FlatPress better?
Neither is universally better. Acrylamid has the larger community, while FlatPress is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Acrylamid and FlatPress free and open-source?
Yes. Acrylamid is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and FlatPress under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Acrylamid and FlatPress with Docker?
Acrylamid: check the project docs for container support. FlatPress: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Acrylamid or FlatPress?
Acrylamid has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for FlatPress. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.