Acrylamid vs Pelican
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Acrylamid
Static blog generator with incremental rebuilds
VS
Pelican
Static site generator for Python and Markdown lovers
| Feature | Acrylamid | Pelican |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 280 | ★ 13,331 |
| First released | 2011 | 2010 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Acrylamid if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Acrylamid or Pelican better?
Neither is universally better. Pelican has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Acrylamid and Pelican free and open-source?
Yes. Acrylamid is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Pelican under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Acrylamid and Pelican with Docker?
Acrylamid: check the project docs for container support. Pelican: check the project docs for container support.