Drone
CI/CD & BuildContainer-based continuous delivery platform
Replaces Jenkins, CircleCI
Best Webhooks CI/CD & Build for self-hosting
The 8 best Webhooks ci/cd & build you can self-host, ranked by community traction.
Argo Workflows
CI/CD & BuildContainer-native workflow engine for Kubernetes
Replaces Airflow
Bytebase
CI/CD & BuildDatabase DevOps and CI/CD for schema changes
Replaces Liquibase, Flyway
Tekton
CI/CD & BuildCloud-native CI/CD building blocks for Kubernetes
Replaces Jenkins, GitHub Actions
Woodpecker CI
CI/CD & BuildSimple, container-native continuous integration
Replaces Jenkins, CircleCI
Buildkite Agent
CI/CD & BuildSelf-hosted CI/CD agent for your own infrastructure
Replaces GitHub Actions, CircleCI
Gitea Act Runner
CI/CD & BuildCI/CD runner for Gitea Actions
Replaces GitHub Actions
Laminar
CI/CD & BuildLightweight and modular continuous integration service
Replaces Jenkins
No apps match these filters.
At a glance
| App | Deploy effort | Difficulty | Min. RAM | License | ★ Stars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drone | Under-an-hour setup | Medium | 256 MB | Apache-2.0 | 38,529 |
| Argo Workflows | Read-the-docs project | Hard | 1,024 MB | Apache-2.0 | 17,036 |
| Bytebase | Under-an-hour setup | Medium | 1,024 MB | MIT | 14,563 |
| Tekton | Read-the-docs project | Hard | 1,024 MB | Apache-2.0 | 9,081 |
| Woodpecker CI | Under-an-hour setup | Medium | 256 MB | Apache-2.0 | 7,999 |
| Buildkite Agent | Under-an-hour setup | Medium | 256 MB | MIT | 1,095 |
| Gitea Act Runner | Under-an-hour setup | Medium | 256 MB | MIT | 800 |
| Laminar | Read-the-docs project | Medium | 128 MB | GPL-3.0 | 356 |
Quick picks
- Most adopted: Drone (38,529 GitHub stars).
- Lightest footprint: Laminar (from 128 MB RAM, against 1,024 MB for the heaviest here).
- Licensing: 4 of 8 use Apache-2.0; check the rest individually if you plan to modify and redistribute.
Every option here is open-source and self-hostable, tagged Webhooks within the ci/cd & build category. Deploy effort is graded from published container recipes, not vendor claims — see the methodology.