WG-Easy vs X2Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WG-Easy
The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
VS
X2Go
Remote desktop access over SSH with NX technology
| Feature | WG-Easy | X2Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 26,595 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2021 | 2007 |
| Replaces | OpenVPN Access Server | Citrix, VNC |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is WG-Easy or X2Go better?
WG-Easy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider X2Go if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are WG-Easy and X2Go free and open-source?
Yes. WG-Easy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and X2Go under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WG-Easy and X2Go with Docker?
WG-Easy: yes. X2Go: check the project docs for container support.