WG-Easy vs WireGuard UI
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WG-Easy
The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
VS
WireGuard UI
Web interface for managing WireGuard configurations
| Feature | WG-Easy | WireGuard UI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 26,595 | ★ 5,137 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | OpenVPN Access Server | OpenVPN Access Server |
Why pick each one
Choose WireGuard UI if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is WG-Easy or WireGuard UI better?
Neither is universally better. WG-Easy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are WG-Easy and WireGuard UI free and open-source?
Yes. WG-Easy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WireGuard UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WG-Easy and WireGuard UI with Docker?
WG-Easy: yes. WireGuard UI: yes.