Websurfx vs YaCy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureWebsurfxYaCy
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageRustJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,171★ 3,999
First released20232003
ReplacesGoogle SearchGoogle Search, Bing

Why pick each one

Choose Websurfx if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Websurfx details

Choose YaCy if…

  • Truly decentralized
  • Censorship resistant
YaCy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Websurfx or YaCy better?

Neither is universally better. YaCy has the larger community, while Websurfx is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Websurfx and YaCy free and open-source?

Yes. Websurfx is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and YaCy under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Websurfx and YaCy with Docker?

Websurfx: yes. YaCy: yes.

Related comparisons