Wallabag vs Wiki.js

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureWallabagWiki.js
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPVue
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 12,884★ 28,727
First released20132017
ReplacesPocket, InstapaperConfluence, Notion

Why pick each one

Choose Wallabag if…

  • Great read-it-later experience
  • Own your reading list
  • Apps available
Wallabag details

Choose Wiki.js if…

  • Flexible and full-featured
  • Many auth options
  • Good content management
Wiki.js details

Frequently asked questions

Is Wallabag or Wiki.js better?

Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Wallabag and Wiki.js free and open-source?

Yes. Wallabag is licensed under MIT and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Wallabag and Wiki.js with Docker?

Wallabag: yes. Wiki.js: yes.

Related comparisons