Wagtail vs Datenstrom Yellow
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Wagtail
Developer-friendly Django CMS with a great editor experience
VS
Datenstrom Yellow
Flat-file CMS for small websites that you control
| Feature | Wagtail | Datenstrom Yellow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,433 | ★ 484 |
| First released | 2014 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, WordPress | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Wagtail or Datenstrom Yellow better?
Neither is universally better. Wagtail has the larger community, while Datenstrom Yellow is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Wagtail and Datenstrom Yellow free and open-source?
Yes. Wagtail is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Datenstrom Yellow under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Wagtail and Datenstrom Yellow with Docker?
Wagtail: yes. Datenstrom Yellow: yes.