Wagtail vs WonderCMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Wagtail
Developer-friendly Django CMS with a great editor experience
VS
WonderCMS
Tiny flat-file CMS that is one of the smallest available
| Feature | Wagtail | WonderCMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,433 | ★ 736 |
| First released | 2014 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, WordPress | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Wagtail or WonderCMS better?
Neither is universally better. Wagtail has the larger community, while WonderCMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Wagtail and WonderCMS free and open-source?
Yes. Wagtail is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and WonderCMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Wagtail and WonderCMS with Docker?
Wagtail: yes. WonderCMS: yes.