SHSelfHostIndex

Virtual TimeClock vs FocusTime Tracker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
VI Virtual TimeClock Powerful, easy-to-use time tracking software VS FO FocusTime Tracker Minimal command-line and web work timer
FeatureVirtual TimeClockFocusTime Tracker
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
License⊘ ProprietaryMIT
LanguageUnknownPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars—★ 2,535
First released20202015
Replaces—Toggl, Harvest

Why pick each one

Choose Virtual TimeClock if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • Written in Unknown
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Virtual TimeClock details

Choose FocusTime Tracker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
FocusTime Tracker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Virtual TimeClock or FocusTime Tracker better?

FocusTime Tracker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Virtual TimeClock if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Virtual TimeClock and FocusTime Tracker free and open-source?

Yes. Virtual TimeClock is licensed under ⊘ Proprietary and FocusTime Tracker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Virtual TimeClock and FocusTime Tracker with Docker?

Virtual TimeClock: check the project docs for container support. FocusTime Tracker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons