Vanna vs Wren AI
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Vanna
Chat with your SQL database using RAG-trained models
VS
Wren AI
Open-source GenBI agent for talking to your database
| Feature | Vanna | Wren AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,823 | ★ 17,180 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | ThoughtSpot | ThoughtSpot |
Why pick each one
Choose Vanna if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 23.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose Wren AI if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Vanna or Wren AI better?
Neither is universally better. Vanna has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Vanna and Wren AI free and open-source?
Yes. Vanna is licensed under MIT and Wren AI under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Vanna and Wren AI with Docker?
Vanna: check the project docs for container support. Wren AI: yes.