Chhoto URL vs Sink
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chhoto URL
Fast, lightweight and FOSS URL shortener in Rust
VS
Sink
Serverless URL shortener with built-in analytics
| Feature | Chhoto URL | Sink |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 929 | ★ 7,000 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | TinyURL, Bitly | Bitly |
Why pick each one
Choose Chhoto URL if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
Choose Sink if…
- Released under the MIT license
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Frequently asked questions
Is Chhoto URL or Sink better?
Neither is universally better. Sink has the larger community, while Chhoto URL is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Chhoto URL and Sink free and open-source?
Yes. Chhoto URL is licensed under MIT and Sink under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chhoto URL and Sink with Docker?
Chhoto URL: yes. Sink: check the project docs for container support.