Univer vs Luckysheet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Univer | Luckysheet |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 95 · Excellent | 15 · At risk |
| Status | Actively maintained | Archived |
| Category | Office Suites | Office Suites |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, docker | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,464 | ★ 16,641 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Sheets, Microsoft Office | Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel |
What are Univer and Luckysheet?
Univer
Univer is an open-source full-stack framework for creating and embedding spreadsheets, documents, and slides. It supports collaboration, formulas, and a plugin architecture.
- Spreadsheets, docs, and slides
- Real-time collaboration
- Plugin architecture
- Embeddable components
Luckysheet
Luckysheet is an open-source, feature-rich online spreadsheet library. It supports formulas, pivot tables, charts, and conditional formatting for embedding in web apps.
- Excel-like spreadsheet UI
- Formulas and pivot tables
- Charts and conditional formats
- Embeddable in web apps
Univer vs Luckysheet: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: Luckysheet's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Univer is actively maintained. Univer is written in TypeScript, while Luckysheet is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Univer versus MIT for Luckysheet. Luckysheet is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Univer. Luckysheet is the more established project (first released 2019), while Univer arrived in 2023. Univer lists first-class Docker deployment; Luckysheet does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Univer if…
- Sheets, docs and slides in one
- Embeddable in web apps
- Active development
Watch out for
- Developer integration required
- Collaboration server is commercial
Choose Luckysheet if…
- Rich spreadsheet features
- Embeds in web apps
- Pivot tables and charts
Watch out for
- Upstream development stopped
- Succeeded by Univer
- Docs mainly Chinese
Frequently asked questions
Is Univer or Luckysheet better?
Luckysheet is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Luckysheet if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Univer and Luckysheet free and open-source?
Yes. Univer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Luckysheet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Univer and Luckysheet with Docker?
Univer: yes. Luckysheet: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Univer or Luckysheet?
Luckysheet has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Univer. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.