OpenCRX vs Fat Free CRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenCRX
Enterprise-class CRM and customer management
VS
Fat Free CRM
Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
| Feature | OpenCRX | Fat Free CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Java | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 88 | ★ 3,628 |
| First released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, Siebel | Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Fat Free CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCRX or Fat Free CRM better?
Fat Free CRM is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenCRX if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenCRX and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?
Yes. OpenCRX is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenCRX and Fat Free CRM with Docker?
OpenCRX: check the project docs for container support. Fat Free CRM: yes.