Tunarr vs xTeVe
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tunarr
Create live TV channels from your Plex and Jellyfin libraries
VS
xTeVe
M3U proxy and HDHomeRun emulator for live TV streaming
| Feature | Tunarr | xTeVe |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | Zlib | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,512 | ★ 2,257 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Cable TV | Cable TV |
Why pick each one
Choose xTeVe if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Tunarr or xTeVe better?
Neither is universally better. Tunarr has the larger community, while xTeVe is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Tunarr and xTeVe free and open-source?
Yes. Tunarr is licensed under Zlib and xTeVe under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tunarr and xTeVe with Docker?
Tunarr: yes. xTeVe: yes.