Transmission vs üWave
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Transmission
Fast, Easy, and Free BitTorrent Client
VS
üWave
Self-hosted collaborative listening platform
| Feature | Transmission | üWave |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C++ | Nodejs |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,047 | — |
| First released | 2023 | 2020 |
| Replaces | µTorrent | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Transmission if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose üWave if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Nodejs
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Transmission or üWave better?
Neither is universally better. Transmission has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Transmission and üWave free and open-source?
Yes. Transmission is licensed under GPL-3.0 and üWave under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Transmission and üWave with Docker?
Transmission: check the project docs for container support. üWave: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Transmission vs Airsonic
- Transmission vs Airsonic-Advanced
- Transmission vs Airsonic-Refix
- Transmission vs Ampache
- Transmission vs AntennaPod gpodder Sync Server Nextcloud GPodder
- Transmission vs Amperfy
- Transmission vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- Transmission vs Audinaut
- Transmission vs Audiobookshelf
- Transmission vs Audioserve