Audinaut vs Transmission

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAudinautTransmission
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB50 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 134★ 15,047
First released20172023
ReplacesSpotifyµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Audinaut if…

  • No ads
  • Lightweight
Audinaut details

Choose Transmission if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Transmission details

Frequently asked questions

Is Audinaut or Transmission better?

Neither is universally better. Transmission has the larger community, while Audinaut is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Audinaut and Transmission free and open-source?

Yes. Audinaut is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Transmission under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Audinaut and Transmission with Docker?

Audinaut: check the project docs for container support. Transmission: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons