Transmission vs Tube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTransmissionTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,047
First released20232023
ReplacesµTorrentDailymotion, Vimeo, YouTube

Why pick each one

Choose Transmission if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Transmission details

Choose Tube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Tube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Transmission or Tube better?

Neither is universally better. Transmission has the larger community, while Tube is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Transmission and Tube free and open-source?

Yes. Transmission is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tube under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Transmission and Tube with Docker?

Transmission: check the project docs for container support. Tube: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons