Traefik vs Zoraxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Traefik
Cloud-native reverse proxy and load balancer
VS
Zoraxy
General-purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool
| Feature | Traefik | Zoraxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 64,330 | ★ 5,370 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | HAProxy, AWS ELB | Nginx Proxy Manager |
Why pick each one
Choose Traefik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Choose Zoraxy if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Traefik or Zoraxy better?
Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community, while Zoraxy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Traefik and Zoraxy free and open-source?
Yes. Traefik is licensed under MIT and Zoraxy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Traefik and Zoraxy with Docker?
Traefik: yes. Zoraxy: yes.