Tracks vs Vikunja
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tracks
GTD-style to-do list and personal organizer
VS
Vikunja
Open-source to-do and project management app
| Feature | Tracks | Vikunja |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,238 | ★ 5,003 |
| First released | 2004 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Todoist, OmniFocus | Todoist, Trello, Asana |
Why pick each one
Choose Tracks if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Tracks or Vikunja better?
Vikunja is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tracks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Tracks and Vikunja free and open-source?
Yes. Tracks is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Vikunja under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tracks and Vikunja with Docker?
Tracks: yes. Vikunja: yes.