Tracks vs Tududi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Tududi
Simple self-hosted task and project management
| Feature | Tracks | Tududi |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 62 · Good | 88 · Excellent |
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,239 | ★ 3,381 |
| First released | 2004 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Todoist, OmniFocus | Todoist, Things |
What are Tracks and Tududi?
Tracks
Tracks is a web-based application designed to help you implement the Getting Things Done methodology. It organizes tasks into projects and contexts with a focus on personal productivity.
- GTD contexts and projects
- Next-action tracking
- Recurring todos
- Mobile-friendly interface
Tududi
Tududi is a self-hosted task management application that organizes tasks into projects and areas with due dates, tags, and notes. It has a lightweight web interface and deploys easily with Docker.
- Projects and areas
- Task due dates and tags
- Lightweight SQLite backend
- Clean simple interface
Tracks vs Tududi: key differences
Tracks is written in Ruby, while Tududi is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for Tracks versus MIT for Tududi. Tududi is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Tracks. Tracks is the more established project (first released 2004), while Tududi arrived in 2023. Tududi has the considerably larger community, at 3,381 GitHub stars versus 1,239.
Why pick each one
Choose Tracks if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Tududi if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Tracks or Tududi better?
Tududi is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tracks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Tracks and Tududi free and open-source?
Yes. Tracks is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Tududi under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tracks and Tududi with Docker?
Tracks: yes. Tududi: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Tracks or Tududi?
Tududi has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Tracks. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.