SHSelfHostIndex

timetrace vs Clockify Selfhost Cattr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI timetrace Simple command-line time tracker for projects VS CL Clockify Selfhost Cattr Open-source time tracking and team productivity
FeaturetimetraceClockify Selfhost Cattr
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 794★ 97
First released20212019
ReplacesClockify, TogglHubstaff, Time Doctor

Why pick each one

Choose timetrace if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
timetrace details

Choose Clockify Selfhost Cattr if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Clockify Selfhost Cattr details

Frequently asked questions

Is timetrace or Clockify Selfhost Cattr better?

timetrace is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Clockify Selfhost Cattr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are timetrace and Clockify Selfhost Cattr free and open-source?

Yes. timetrace is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Clockify Selfhost Cattr under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run timetrace and Clockify Selfhost Cattr with Docker?

timetrace: check the project docs for container support. Clockify Selfhost Cattr: yes.

Related comparisons