Tasks.org CalDAV Sync vs vdirsyncer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTasks.org CalDAV Syncvdirsyncer
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageKotlinPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 2,784★ 1,859
First released20132014
ReplacesGoogle Calendar Sync, iCloud synciCloud sync

Why pick each one

Choose Tasks.org CalDAV Sync if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Kotlin
Tasks.org CalDAV Sync details

Choose vdirsyncer if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
vdirsyncer details

Frequently asked questions

Is Tasks.org CalDAV Sync or vdirsyncer better?

Tasks.org CalDAV Sync is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider vdirsyncer if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Tasks.org CalDAV Sync and vdirsyncer free and open-source?

Yes. Tasks.org CalDAV Sync is licensed under GPL-3.0 and vdirsyncer under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Tasks.org CalDAV Sync and vdirsyncer with Docker?

Tasks.org CalDAV Sync: check the project docs for container support. vdirsyncer: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons