Alf.io vs vdirsyncer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAlf.iovdirsyncer
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageJavaPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,601★ 1,859
First released20252014
ReplacesiCloud sync

Why pick each one

Choose Alf.io if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Alf.io details

Choose vdirsyncer if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
vdirsyncer details

Frequently asked questions

Is Alf.io or vdirsyncer better?

Neither is universally better. vdirsyncer has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Alf.io and vdirsyncer free and open-source?

Yes. Alf.io is licensed under GPL-3.0 and vdirsyncer under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Alf.io and vdirsyncer with Docker?

Alf.io: check the project docs for container support. vdirsyncer: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons