Decsync Calendar Sync vs Xandikos

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDecsync Calendar SyncXandikos
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score15 · At risk80 · Excellent
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageKotlinPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentsource, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 699★ 606
First released20182016
ReplacesGoogle CalendarGoogle Calendar, iCloud

What are Decsync Calendar Sync and Xandikos?

Decsync Calendar Sync

Decsync is a method and toolset for synchronizing calendars and contacts via a shared folder rather than a central server. Self-hosters pair it with a file-sync service to keep events consistent across devices.

  • Folder-based sync
  • No central server
  • Calendar and contacts
  • Pairs with any file sync

Xandikos

Xandikos is a lightweight CalDAV and CardDAV server that stores all data in a Git repository. This gives version history for every calendar and contact change with minimal infrastructure.

  • Git-backed storage with history
  • No database required
  • Lightweight footprint

Decsync Calendar Sync vs Xandikos: key differences

Decsync Calendar Sync is written in Kotlin, while Xandikos is built with Python. Xandikos is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Decsync Calendar Sync. Xandikos is the more established project (first released 2016), while Decsync Calendar Sync arrived in 2018. Xandikos lists first-class Docker deployment; Decsync Calendar Sync does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Decsync Calendar Sync if…

  • Server-free architecture
  • Privacy friendly

Watch out for

  • Requires a sync layer
  • Setup is non-trivial
Decsync Calendar Sync details

Choose Xandikos if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Xandikos details

Frequently asked questions

Is Decsync Calendar Sync or Xandikos better?

Neither is universally better. Decsync Calendar Sync has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Decsync Calendar Sync and Xandikos free and open-source?

Yes. Decsync Calendar Sync is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Xandikos under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Decsync Calendar Sync and Xandikos with Docker?

Decsync Calendar Sync: check the project docs for container support. Xandikos: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Decsync Calendar Sync or Xandikos?

Xandikos has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Decsync Calendar Sync. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons