TeamPass vs Vaultwarden
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
TeamPass
Collaborative password manager for teams
VS
Vaultwarden
Lightweight Bitwarden-compatible password server
| Feature | TeamPass | Vaultwarden |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,819 | ★ 65,100 |
| First released | 2010 | 2018 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | 1Password, LastPass, Dashlane |
Why pick each one
Choose Vaultwarden if…
- Extremely lightweight
- Works with official apps
- Easy to deploy
Frequently asked questions
Is TeamPass or Vaultwarden better?
Vaultwarden is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TeamPass if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are TeamPass and Vaultwarden free and open-source?
Yes. TeamPass is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Vaultwarden under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TeamPass and Vaultwarden with Docker?
TeamPass: yes. Vaultwarden: yes.