TeamPass vs Vaultwarden
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Vaultwarden
Lightweight Bitwarden-compatible password server
| Feature | TeamPass | Vaultwarden |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | ≈5-minute setup |
| Health score | 85 · Excellent | 100 · Excellent |
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,828 | ★ 68,080 |
| First released | 2010 | 2018 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | 1Password, LastPass, Dashlane |
What are TeamPass and Vaultwarden?
TeamPass
TeamPass is a collaborative password manager that lets teams store and share credentials with granular access rights. It targets IT teams managing shared passwords. It is deployed via Docker or a PHP stack.
- Granular access control
- Folder-based credential organization
- LDAP integration
- Audit logging
Vaultwarden
Vaultwarden is a lightweight, unofficial Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust that works with all official Bitwarden clients. It targets self-hosters who want Bitwarden without heavy resource use. It is deployed via Docker.
- Compatible with all Bitwarden clients
- Tiny resource footprint
- Organizations and sharing
- Includes premium-equivalent features
TeamPass vs Vaultwarden: key differences
TeamPass is written in PHP, while Vaultwarden is built with Rust. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for TeamPass versus AGPL-3.0 for Vaultwarden. Vaultwarden is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for TeamPass. TeamPass is the more established project (first released 2010), while Vaultwarden arrived in 2018. Vaultwarden has the considerably larger community, at 68,080 GitHub stars versus 1,828.
Why pick each one
Choose TeamPass if…
- Good for shared team passwords
- Detailed permissions
- Mature
Watch out for
- Dated interface
- Configuration is involved
Choose Vaultwarden if…
- Extremely lightweight
- Works with official apps
- Easy to deploy
Watch out for
- Unofficial, community project
- Self-hosting security is on you
Frequently asked questions
Is TeamPass or Vaultwarden better?
Vaultwarden is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider TeamPass if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are TeamPass and Vaultwarden free and open-source?
Yes. TeamPass is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Vaultwarden under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TeamPass and Vaultwarden with Docker?
TeamPass: yes. Vaultwarden: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, TeamPass or Vaultwarden?
Vaultwarden has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for TeamPass. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.