Tangram vs Traccar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Tangram | Traccar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,335 | ★ 7,563 |
| First released | 2013 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Mapbox GL JS, Google Maps | Google Maps, Life360 |
Why pick each one
Choose Tangram if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Traccar if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Tangram or Traccar better?
Neither is universally better. Traccar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Tangram and Traccar free and open-source?
Yes. Tangram is licensed under MIT and Traccar under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tangram and Traccar with Docker?
Tangram: check the project docs for container support. Traccar: yes.