Tailscale vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTailscaleWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 34,934★ 26,595
First released20192021
ReplacesZeroTierOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose Tailscale if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 34.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Tailscale details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Tailscale or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. Tailscale has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Tailscale and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Tailscale and WG-Easy with Docker?

Tailscale: check the project docs for container support. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons