Sync-in vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSync-inSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-laterMPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,630★ 87,439
First released20252014
ReplacesDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Sync-in if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Sync-in details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sync-in or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sync-in if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Sync-in and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Sync-in is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sync-in and Syncthing with Docker?

Sync-in: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons