Statping-ng vs Uptime Kuma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Uptime Kuma
Easy self-hosted uptime monitoring tool
| Feature | Statping-ng | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | ≈5-minute setup |
| Health score | 30 · At risk | 100 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,992 | ★ 91,752 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | UptimeRobot, Pingdom | Pingdom, UptimeRobot |
What are Statping-ng and Uptime Kuma?
Statping-ng
Statping-ng is a community-maintained status page and uptime monitoring server that tracks services and publishes a public status page. It targets teams wanting a self-hosted status page. It is deployed via Docker or a binary.
- Public status pages
- Service uptime tracking
- Notifier plugins
- Mobile app available
Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that checks the availability of websites, services, and APIs with a clean dashboard. It targets users who want a simple, attractive status monitor. It is deployed via Docker as a single container.
- Monitors HTTP, TCP, DNS and more
- Beautiful dashboard and status pages
- 90+ notification integrations
- Single-container deployment
Statping-ng vs Uptime Kuma: key differences
Statping-ng is written in Go, while Uptime Kuma is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Statping-ng versus MIT for Uptime Kuma. Statping-ng is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Uptime Kuma. Statping-ng is the more established project (first released 2018), while Uptime Kuma arrived in 2021. Uptime Kuma has the considerably larger community, at 91,752 GitHub stars versus 1,992.
Why pick each one
Choose Statping-ng if…
- Nice status pages
- Single binary
- Easy to host
Watch out for
- Slower development
- Fewer checks than Uptime Kuma
Choose Uptime Kuma if…
- Very easy to use
- Great notifications
- Lightweight
Watch out for
- Single instance, no clustering
- Not for deep metrics
Frequently asked questions
Is Statping-ng or Uptime Kuma better?
Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Statping-ng and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?
Yes. Statping-ng is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Statping-ng and Uptime Kuma with Docker?
Statping-ng: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Statping-ng or Uptime Kuma?
Statping-ng has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Uptime Kuma. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.