Static Web Server vs Traefik
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Static Web Server
Cross-platform, high-performance, and asynchronous web server for
VS
Traefik
Cloud-native reverse proxy and load balancer
| Feature | Static Web Server | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,312 | ★ 64,330 |
| First released | 2026 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | HAProxy, AWS ELB |
Why pick each one
Choose Static Web Server if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Choose Traefik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Static Web Server or Traefik better?
Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Static Web Server and Traefik free and open-source?
Yes. Static Web Server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Static Web Server and Traefik with Docker?
Static Web Server: yes. Traefik: yes.