SHSelfHostIndex

Sshwifty vs WebSSH

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SS Sshwifty Web-based SSH and Telnet client VS WE WebSSH SSH client running in a web browser via WebSockets
FeatureSshwiftyWebSSH
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 3,112★ 5,135
First released20192017
ReplacesPuTTYPuTTY

Why pick each one

Choose Sshwifty if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Sshwifty details

Choose WebSSH if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
WebSSH details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sshwifty or WebSSH better?

Neither is universally better. WebSSH has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Sshwifty and WebSSH free and open-source?

Yes. Sshwifty is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WebSSH under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sshwifty and WebSSH with Docker?

Sshwifty: yes. WebSSH: yes.

Related comparisons