sprunge vs wastebin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuresprungewastebin
CategoryPastebins & SnippetsPastebins & Snippets
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 721★ 832
First released20102022
ReplacesPastebin.com, termbinPastebin.com

Why pick each one

Choose sprunge if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
sprunge details

Choose wastebin if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
wastebin details

Frequently asked questions

Is sprunge or wastebin better?

Neither is universally better. wastebin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are sprunge and wastebin free and open-source?

Yes. sprunge is licensed under MIT and wastebin under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run sprunge and wastebin with Docker?

sprunge: check the project docs for container support. wastebin: yes.

Related comparisons