SourceHut vs Gitea Bots Mirror
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
SourceHut
The hacker's forge, 100% free and open source
VS
Gitea Bots Mirror
Lightweight private Go module proxy
| Feature | SourceHut | Gitea Bots Mirror |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,000 | ★ 4,789 |
| First released | 2018 | 2017 |
| Replaces | GitHub, GitLab | JFrog Artifactory |
Why pick each one
Choose SourceHut if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose Gitea Bots Mirror if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is SourceHut or Gitea Bots Mirror better?
Gitea Bots Mirror is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider SourceHut if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are SourceHut and Gitea Bots Mirror free and open-source?
Yes. SourceHut is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Gitea Bots Mirror under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run SourceHut and Gitea Bots Mirror with Docker?
SourceHut: check the project docs for container support. Gitea Bots Mirror: yes.