Agola vs SourceHut
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Agola
CI/CD redefined for cloud-native workflows
VS
SourceHut
The hacker's forge, 100% free and open source
| Feature | Agola | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,622 | ★ 2,000 |
| First released | 2019 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Drone, GitHub Actions | GitHub, GitLab |
Why pick each one
Choose Agola if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Choose SourceHut if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Agola or SourceHut better?
Neither is universally better. SourceHut has the larger community, while Agola is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Agola and SourceHut free and open-source?
Yes. Agola is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SourceHut under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Agola and SourceHut with Docker?
Agola: yes. SourceHut: check the project docs for container support.